Post by Iqra on Sept 29, 2013 20:48:23 GMT -5
There is chapter of the spider there, but I want to talk about different kind of bugs. (I'm not even sure if spiders are a kind of bugs, I don't like them anyway). We shall compare the Muslim holy book to a computer program...
Computer programs are written by developer guys and before the product is "tested" by consumers, the hired testers will check the program for errors they call "bugs". Bugs can be mildly irritating or they can crash the program one is trying to use or even worse. As we see here the person who puts the bugs in the program in the first place isn't the best one for finding them before the product will be released to the user.
So I propose we write a big bug report on Quran since poor Muhammad had no testers to help him and the only way he could assure the high product quality for all users was beheading those who were not satisfied.
Clearly this is a post release testing that could result in an improved version.
I will begin:
#1. The same shit is repeated over and over and over again to the point of you wanting to switch to an alternative program altogether. How to find (reproduce) the bug: open the book randomly and read for 5 minutes. Bug severity: obviously pretty fucking severe, makes one question author's intelligence or writing skills at least, makes the user yawn and loose interest, in other words, some quite essential requirements when it comes to holy books are not met. Fix that shit NAO.
Computer programs are written by developer guys and before the product is "tested" by consumers, the hired testers will check the program for errors they call "bugs". Bugs can be mildly irritating or they can crash the program one is trying to use or even worse. As we see here the person who puts the bugs in the program in the first place isn't the best one for finding them before the product will be released to the user.
So I propose we write a big bug report on Quran since poor Muhammad had no testers to help him and the only way he could assure the high product quality for all users was beheading those who were not satisfied.
Clearly this is a post release testing that could result in an improved version.
I will begin:
#1. The same shit is repeated over and over and over again to the point of you wanting to switch to an alternative program altogether. How to find (reproduce) the bug: open the book randomly and read for 5 minutes. Bug severity: obviously pretty fucking severe, makes one question author's intelligence or writing skills at least, makes the user yawn and loose interest, in other words, some quite essential requirements when it comes to holy books are not met. Fix that shit NAO.